Skip to main content
RapidDev - Software Development Agency

White Label Blockchain Platform

No 'license-and-rebrand blockchain platform' exists for no-code buyers. White-label crypto-exchange and wallet stacks exist but charge revenue share (from ~0.4%/transaction) and are sales-gated and heavily regulated under MiCA and money-transmission laws. For most builders, the honest path is a branded dApp front-end or dashboard built over existing chains (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon) and custody providers — own the interface, integrate the chain, not build it. Custom dApp front-ends run $13K–$25K one-time.

4.9Clutch rating
600+Happy partners
17+Countries served
190+Team members

What is a white-label blockchain platform?

A white-label blockchain platform is, in practice, a branded interface layer that connects users to existing blockchain infrastructure — wallets, smart contracts, token balances, and transaction history displayed under your logo and domain. You do not 'get a blockchain' as a rebrandable box; you build a dApp front-end (decentralized application interface) or client dashboard that talks to established public chains (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, and others) or to custody and settlement providers you integrate separately.

White-label crypto-exchange and wallet stacks do exist as a product category — companies like ChangeNOW operate reseller programs where you put your brand on their exchange functionality. The research cites revenue share starting from approximately 0.4% per transaction for such programs. These are real products, but they come with significant constraints: MiCA (EU) and money-transmission licensing requirements, KYC/AML obligations, sales-gated pricing with no public rate cards, and revenue-share structures that permanently cap your margin on every transaction your users make.

For most builders, the realistic and honest architecture is: brand a custom dApp front-end or dashboard, integrate existing chains via RPC endpoints (Infura, Alchemy, QuickNode), and use established custody/settlement providers for any fiat-on/off-ramp or regulated financial function. The blockchain is public infrastructure you build on — like building a travel booking app on airline APIs, not building an airline. The Bubble slug artifact on this page tells the real story: buyers want a branded product experience on top of blockchain, not the blockchain itself.

Who uses this

DeFi product teams wanting a branded front-end for their smart contracts without building the full UI stack from scratch. Web3 startups launching a token dashboard, NFT marketplace, or wallet companion app under their own brand. Crypto funds and portfolio managers wanting a branded client-facing view of on-chain holdings and performance. Fintech companies exploring blockchain settlement rails and needing a branded customer interface. Agencies building white-labeled blockchain experiences for enterprise clients who want blockchain features without direct chain complexity.

No no-code 'license-and-rebrand blockchain' product exists. Closest options: white-label crypto-exchange and wallet stacks (such as ChangeNOW's reseller program, cited in the research at revenue share from approximately 0.4% per transaction) — sales-gated, MiCA-bound, and custom-contracted with no public rate cards. Public chains and SDKs (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon; wallet connection libraries like MetaMask/WalletConnect; embedded wallet providers) are infrastructure you build on, not products you rebrand. Bubble and custom front-end development are the honest 'build a branded dApp' path. SuiteDash ($14–$69/account/mo) and GoHighLevel ($297–$497/mo) work as generic branded portals if the 'blockchain' need is really just a client-facing dashboard for data you aggregate off-chain.

Quick verdict

For a branded dApp front-end, dashboard, or wallet interface, a custom build at $13K–$25K over existing chains is the most defensible path — you own the UI, integrate the chains you choose, and avoid perpetual revenue-share. White-label exchange or wallet stacks exist but require accepting revenue-share economics and someone else's compliance rails, which is the right trade-off only when speed and pre-built regulatory coverage matter more than long-term margin.

Go white-label if

You accept a revenue-share exchange or wallet stack for speed and their compliance infrastructure, and putting your brand in front of users matters more than margin — understanding that revenue share permanently caps your upside.

Go custom if

Your dApp workflow, user experience, or token logic is the differentiator, you integrate existing chains and custody providers yourself, and you want to own the front-end code and avoid perpetual revenue share compounding against your transaction volume.

White-label vs off-the-shelf vs custom

The three real ways to run a Blockchain Platform. The highlighted cell wins each row.

AspectWhite-labelOff-the-shelf SaaSCustom build
Time to launch6–12 weeks (exchange/wallet stack + compliance review)Immediate (public chains + wallets — no brand)6–10 weeks (dApp front-end)
Upfront cost$0–$5,000 (front-end config; exchange stack setup may be higher, verify)$0 (infrastructure only)$13,000–$25,000 fixed
Monthly feesRevenue share (from ~0.4%/transaction) + RPC/node feesRPC/node fees only (no platform fee)~$100/mo hosting + RPC/custody provider fees
Branding depthCustom domain, logo, colors on exchange UI — underlying provider may still appear in regulatory disclosuresNone — chain and wallet branding visible100% your brand on every screen
Feature flexibilityLimited to the exchange/wallet stack's product capabilitiesFull — any smart contract, any chain, any DeFi protocolFull — any token logic, any chain integration, any UX
Code and data ownershipVendor retains the product code; you own the brand layer onlyNo product ownership — public chain dataFull source code ownership — dApp front-end is yours
Scaling economicsRevenue share compounds with every transaction — caps margin permanentlyRPC and gas fees scale with usage — no rev-share capRPC and gas fees scale with usage; no rev-share; custom build amortizes over time
Exit optionsMigrating users and wallets off a closed exchange stack is complex and potentially impossible (custody data, order history)Fully portable — public blockchain data is permissionlessFull portability — own your front-end code and user data

Swipe the table sideways to see all three paths.

Features a Blockchain Platform actually needs

Must-havedeal-breakersEdgedifferentiators

Wallet connect and authentication

Must-have

Integration with MetaMask, WalletConnect, and embedded wallet providers — the entry point for every on-chain interaction; without it, users cannot connect to your product.

Smart contract read and write via RPC

Must-have

Read contract state and send transactions to chosen chain(s) via RPC endpoint (Infura, Alchemy, QuickNode) — the core blockchain interaction layer that makes any dApp functional.

Transaction history and on-chain status tracking

Must-have

Display transaction history with confirmation count, status (pending/confirmed/failed), and block explorer links — users expect real-time visibility into every on-chain action.

Token and asset dashboard

Must-have

Balances, token prices, portfolio value, transfer history, and NFT holdings displayed in a branded interface — the primary view for any wallet or portfolio product.

KYC and AML onboarding

Must-have

If fiat currency or token exchange is involved, KYC/AML verification (SumSub, Persona, or equivalent) is a regulatory requirement — not optional under MiCA, FinCEN, or any jurisdiction's money-transmission rules.

Multi-tenant branding and user management

Must-have

If the product serves multiple clients or portfolios, each client sees only their own assets and transaction history under the shared branded platform — tenant isolation is non-negotiable.

Role-based access and API key management

Must-have

Separate permissions for admins, portfolio managers, and read-only viewers, plus API keys for programmatic integration with custody and settlement providers.

Gas and fee estimation

Must-have

Real-time gas estimation and fee display before transaction submission — users will blame your product for failed or expensive transactions if fee visibility is absent.

Audit log and exportable transaction records

Must-have

Every user action, transaction submission, and portfolio change logged with timestamp and user ID — required for compliance reporting, fund audits, and dispute resolution.

Integration hooks to custody and settlement providers

Must-have

Interfaces to regulated custody (Fireblocks, Anchorage-class) and fiat on/off-ramp providers — the compliance-regulated layer you integrate, not build in-house.

Multi-chain support

Edge

Native support for 2+ chains (e.g., Ethereum mainnet + L2s like Arbitrum, Optimism, or Base) — single-chain products are increasingly limiting as ecosystems expand.

Smart contract interaction interface

Edge

A no-code or guided interface for calling contract functions — for DEX interactions, staking, governance voting, or any on-chain protocol your users interact with.

The real cost of a white-label Blockchain Platform

Sticker price is never the whole story. Here is what you actually pay.

Setup fee

$0–$5,000

one-time onboarding

Monthly

$14–$497/mo

recurring, forever

Custom (one-time)

$13,000–$25,000 one-time

you own it

White-label exchange and wallet stacks commonly use revenue share — the research cites ChangeNOW's reseller program starting from approximately 0.4% per transaction. At scale this compounds: 1,000 transactions/day averaging $500 each generates $500,000/day in volume; at 0.4% revenue share that's $2,000/day or $730,000/yr to the platform before any operational costs.

Hidden costs to budget for

Revenue share permanently caps margin

Revenue-share exchange stacks take their cut on every transaction your users make, forever — starting at approximately 0.4% per transaction (ChangeNOW, cited in research). At meaningful volume this exceeds the amortized cost of a custom build within 24–36 months. The research's own benchmark: 'choose custom when projected revenue-share payments exceed the amortized custom build cost within ~24–36 months.'

MiCA and money-transmission compliance costs

Operating under a white-label exchange or wallet stack means operating under the provider's regulatory license — MiCA (EU), FinCEN/BitLicense (US), or equivalent. If you operate under your own brand but someone else's license, regulatory scope flows to you in ways that vary by contract (get it in writing). KYC/AML integration, ongoing compliance monitoring, and legal counsel to review your regulatory posture are not included in any platform fee.

RPC and node infrastructure fees

Every on-chain read and write hits an RPC endpoint. Alchemy, Infura, and QuickNode charge based on compute units (CUs) per month — Alchemy's free tier covers 300 million CUs/mo, but a medium-traffic dApp easily exhausts this, with paid plans running $49–$499+/mo. These costs persist regardless of dashboard choice.

Gas fees (unpredictable and user-visible)

On-chain transactions require gas paid in the native chain token (ETH for Ethereum, SOL for Solana). Gas prices fluctuate with network congestion — Ethereum mainnet gas spikes to $50–$200+ per transaction during peak periods. If your product pays gas on behalf of users (gasless transactions via paymasters), this becomes an operational cost line you must budget for.

Custody and settlement provider fees

Regulated custody (Fireblocks, Anchorage-class) for institutional or compliant consumer products charges setup fees and ongoing per-transaction or per-asset-under-custody fees — pricing is entirely sales-gated. Fiat on/off-ramp providers charge a spread or per-transaction fee on every conversion. These are non-optional costs for any product touching fiat currency.

3-year cost reality

A custom dApp front-end at $13K–$25K one-time plus ~$100/mo hosting runs $16,600–$28,600 over 3 years — replacing the platform dashboard fee but not the RPC, custody, or gas costs that persist either way. Against a revenue-share exchange stack at 0.4%/transaction, custom pays back the moment accumulated revenue-share payments exceed the build cost: at $500K/mo transaction volume, that's roughly 26–50 months. At $5M/mo volume, the payback is under 6 months. Revenue-share economics mean the right answer flips as volume grows.

White-label launch roadmap

Launching a branded blockchain product requires two tracks running in parallel: regulatory and compliance review (often the long pole) and front-end development. Underestimating the compliance timeline is the most common blockchain project failure mode.

1

Regulatory scoping

2–4 weeks (parallel to all other phases)

Determine whether your product touches money transmission, securities, or exchange functionality under your target jurisdictions' laws. If you handle fiat or operate an exchange, you either operate under a licensed provider's rails or obtain your own license (a multi-year process). Define your regulatory perimeter before writing a line of code — it determines the entire product architecture.

Watch out: The research explicitly flags regulatory review as a top launch-staller in crypto. MiCA (EU) is now in force; US money-transmission law is jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction. Do not assume 'it's just a front-end' — if you facilitate token swaps or fiat conversion, you likely touch regulated activity.

2

Chain and infrastructure selection

1 week

Choose which chain(s) to integrate (Ethereum mainnet, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base, Solana) based on your target user base and protocol requirements. Select RPC providers (Alchemy, Infura, QuickNode) and evaluate whether a custody provider is required. Define the smart contracts your front-end will interact with — deployed contracts or contracts you develop separately.

Watch out: Committing to a single L1 (e.g., Ethereum mainnet only) can limit your addressable market and create high gas costs for users. Multi-chain support is architecturally cheaper to build upfront than to bolt on later.

3

Front-end development or platform configuration

4–8 weeks

For custom: build the wallet connection layer, dashboard views, transaction submission flows, and audit log. For a white-label exchange stack: configure branding, integrate KYC provider, test the transaction flow end-to-end in sandbox, and verify revenue-share accounting. In either case, test gas estimation, error handling, and transaction failure states extensively.

Watch out: Smart contract interactions that fail without clear error messaging create a terrible user experience and are one of the top reasons users abandon web3 products. Build comprehensive error handling for failed transactions, rejected signatures, and gas estimation failures before launch.

4

KYC/AML integration and compliance review

2–4 weeks

Integrate your KYC/AML provider (SumSub, Persona, or equivalent), configure the risk-tier rules for your user categories, and run compliance review of your transaction monitoring and SAR-filing process if applicable. If using a white-label exchange stack, confirm whose KYC/AML obligation this is — yours, the provider's, or shared.

Watch out: KYC and payment processor onboarding is the most common blockchain launch stall. PSPs and custody providers often require EU entity structure, detailed compliance documentation, and due-diligence processes that take 4–12 weeks. Factor this into your timeline from day one.

5

Security audit and mainnet launch

1–3 weeks

If your product interacts with smart contracts holding user funds, a third-party security audit of those contracts is strongly recommended before mainnet launch. Run a limited beta with real users and real transactions on mainnet before broad launch to catch gas estimation issues, chain reorg edge cases, and UX friction points.

Watch out: Launching on mainnet without a smart contract audit when user funds are involved is an existential risk. The cost of a professional audit ($10K–$50K+ depending on contract complexity) is trivial compared to the cost of a hack.

Vendor red flags & what to ask

Before you sign, pressure-test every vendor with these. The wrong answer here costs you later.

Revenue-share terms are not disclosed before a sales call

Revenue-share percentages on transaction volume are the single most impactful commercial term in any exchange or wallet white-label deal. A vendor who won't disclose the rate before a sales conversation makes it impossible to build a financial model.

Ask the vendor:"Before we schedule a demo: what is the exact revenue-share percentage on transaction volume, are there minimum guarantees, and what is the basis for calculation — gross volume, net volume, or spread?"

Regulatory license scope is undefined or passed to you

Operating a branded exchange or wallet under someone else's regulatory license means you operate within their compliance framework, their jurisdiction restrictions, and their liability scope — or you bear the liability yourself. Sources conflict on who bears this responsibility; 'get it in writing' is not optional.

Ask the vendor:"Whose MiCA registration or money-transmission license does my branded product operate under, who bears regulatory compliance liability for KYC/AML failures, and can I see that stated explicitly in the contract?"

User and wallet data cannot be exported at termination

User account data, KYC records, transaction history, and custody balances are assets that belong to your product. A vendor whose contract doesn't guarantee export of these in a portable format leaves your users stranded if you exit the platform.

Ask the vendor:"At termination, in what exact format, on what timeline, and at what cost can I export all user records, KYC data, transaction history, and custody balances — and can I take my users with me to another provider?"

Smart contract interaction with no error handling documentation

On-chain transactions can fail at multiple layers (gas estimation, nonce conflict, contract revert, chain congestion). A platform with no documented error-handling behavior or error recovery UX will create user-facing failures that your brand absorbs.

Ask the vendor:"What happens in the user interface when a transaction fails due to gas price spike, smart contract revert, or wallet rejection — and what recovery options does the platform surface to users?"

No support for chain or custody provider switching

The blockchain ecosystem evolves rapidly — new L2s, new custody providers, new compliance rails. A platform that locks you to one chain or one custody provider cannot adapt as the market changes, trapping your users.

Ask the vendor:"If I want to add support for a new chain or switch custody providers in 12 months, what is the process, cost, and timeline — and is there a contractual restriction on my ability to add competing infrastructure?"

KYC/AML obligation is ambiguous in the contract

KYC and AML failures are criminal liability in many jurisdictions, not just civil violations. If the contract is ambiguous about which party is responsible for customer due diligence, you may be liable for failures in a process you don't control.

Ask the vendor:"In this agreement, who is the responsible party for customer due diligence and KYC/AML obligations under applicable law — and is there a written indemnity from you if your KYC process fails to identify a sanctioned user?"

How far can you actually customize it?

Typical branding

  • Custom domain and SSL (yourapp.com, not exchange-vendor.com)
  • Logo, color scheme, and typography on all wallet and dashboard screens
  • Branded login and wallet connection flow
  • Removal of provider 'powered by' branding (verify which tier this applies to)
  • Custom transaction confirmation and onboarding email templates from your sending domain
  • Branded mobile app if the exchange stack includes one (typically an add-on or enterprise tier)

Typical limits

  • Smart contract logic — the underlying exchange or settlement contracts are the vendor's, not yours
  • KYC/AML workflow — the vendor's compliance engine runs the checks; you configure parameters within their ruleset
  • Revenue-share calculation — the vendor's accounting system determines the split; you receive reports, not source data
  • Chain support — you're limited to the chains the vendor has integrated; adding a new chain requires vendor support
  • Custody architecture — the vendor controls where and how user assets are custodied; you interact via their API only
  • Regulatory license scope — you operate within the boundaries of the vendor's license, not your own

Custom unlocks

  • Full control over the dApp user experience — any UX flow, any design system, any onboarding journey without platform template constraints
  • Chain selection freedom — integrate Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base, or any EVM/Solana-compatible chain without waiting for a vendor roadmap
  • Custody provider choice — connect to Fireblocks, Anchorage, or any custody API that meets your regulatory requirements, and switch without rebuilding the front-end
  • Revenue model ownership — no revenue share on any transaction; your monetization model (spread, subscription, per-transaction fee) is entirely yours
  • Smart contract interaction design — any protocol integration (DEX, lending, staking, governance) built as a first-class feature in your UI
  • Custom KYC/AML workflow — integrate the compliance provider and risk-tier logic that matches your specific jurisdiction and user population

Which path fits you?

DeFi startup launching a protocol front-end

Custom fits

You've deployed smart contracts for a lending protocol and need a branded dApp front-end for users to interact with them. Custom development at $13K–$25K is the right path — you own the UI, integrate your contracts directly, and have no revenue-share obligation.

Crypto fund needing a client portfolio dashboard

Custom fits

You manage $5M in on-chain assets across 20 investors and want a branded portal for each investor to view their positions, historical performance, and transaction history. A custom dashboard connecting to your custody provider's API is cleaner and more controllable than a generic exchange stack.

Fintech startup testing a crypto exchange product

White-label fits

You want to validate whether users will pay for a branded crypto exchange before investing heavily in compliance infrastructure. A white-label exchange stack with revenue share gets you to market in 6–12 weeks to test the hypothesis — accepting that you'll need to renegotiate terms or migrate if volume grows.

Enterprise company adding blockchain settlement to an existing platform

Custom fits

You operate a B2B payments platform and want to add stablecoin settlement as an option for enterprise clients. Custom integration of a compliant custody provider into your existing platform is the right architecture — you don't need a standalone 'blockchain platform,' you need a settlement rail integrated into your product.

NFT marketplace builder

Custom fits

You want to launch a branded NFT marketplace for a specific creator community or asset category. Custom front-end over OpenSea's API or a custom smart contract gives you the user experience control and revenue model flexibility that a white-label exchange stack doesn't offer for this use case.

A white-label you actually own

Renting someone else's Blockchain Platformworks until it doesn't. RapidDev builds you a custom, fully-branded platform using AI-accelerated development — delivered in weeks, and yours to keep with zero recurring platform fees.

1

Discovery call (free)

30 min

We map exactly what your Blockchain Platform needs — the features white-label vendors gate behind upgrades, your branding, integrations, and users. You get a scoped, fixed-price quote within 48 hours.

2

AI-accelerated build

6–10 weeks

Our engineers use Claude Code, Lovable, and custom AI tooling to build 3–5x faster than traditional agencies. You review progress in a live staging environment every week — never a black box.

3

Launch + handoff

1 week

We deploy to your infrastructure, hand over the GitHub repo, wire up CI/CD, and walk your team through the codebase. You own 100% of it — no per-seat fees, no vendor lock-in.

What you get

Wallet connection layer (MetaMask, WalletConnect, embedded wallet provider integration)
Smart contract read and write interface for your chosen chain(s) via RPC
Token and asset dashboard with balances, prices, and transfer history
Transaction submission flow with gas estimation, error handling, and status tracking
Audit log of all user actions and transaction events with export
Role-based access for admins, portfolio managers, and read-only viewers
KYC/AML provider integration (SumSub or equivalent — provider license/cost separate)
Multi-tenant architecture for client or portfolio isolation (if applicable)

Timeline

6–10 weeks

Investment

$13K–$25K fixed

Breakeven

Against a revenue-share exchange stack at approximately 0.4%/transaction, a custom dApp at $13K–$25K pays back when accumulated revenue-share exceeds the build cost. At $100K/month transaction volume: revenue share ~$400/mo, payback in roughly 33–63 months. At $1M/month transaction volume: revenue share ~$4,000/mo, payback in roughly 3–6 months. Custom wins faster as your volume grows — which is exactly when the revenue-share model hurts most.

Get your free estimate

30-min call. Fixed-price quote within 48 hours. No commitment.

Frequently asked questions

How much does a white-label blockchain platform cost?

For a dApp front-end or client dashboard, setup costs $0–$5,000 and hosting runs ~$100/mo plus RPC provider fees ($49–$499+/mo depending on traffic). White-label crypto-exchange or wallet stacks use revenue share starting from approximately 0.4% per transaction (ChangeNOW, cited in research) with pricing otherwise sales-gated. A custom dApp front-end runs $13K–$25K one-time. Gas, custody, and RPC costs are separate and persist regardless of which path you choose.

Can I actually license and rebrand a full blockchain platform — including the chain itself?

No. Public blockchains (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon) are permissionless public infrastructure — you build on them, you don't rebrand them. Private or consortium chains exist but require substantial technical and legal infrastructure to operate and are enterprise-grade custom projects, not consumer products. What you can license and rebrand is the application layer: the exchange UI, wallet, dashboard, or dApp front-end that connects users to existing chains.

How fast can I launch a branded blockchain product?

A custom dApp front-end takes 6–10 weeks to build. A white-label exchange stack takes 6–12 weeks once you account for branding, KYC integration, and compliance review. The real stall is regulatory: KYC/AML provider onboarding and payment-processor/custody setup typically takes 4–12 weeks, especially if fiat currency is involved. The research explicitly flags regulatory review as the top blockchain launch staller.

Do I own my users' data and wallet history with a white-label blockchain platform?

On-chain transaction data is public and permissionless — it's owned by no one and accessible to anyone. Off-chain data (KYC records, user accounts, order history on a centralized exchange) lives in the platform vendor's database. Confirm in writing: the format, timeline, cost, and completeness of a full data export at termination — including the ability to take your users' KYC and account history to a competing provider.

White-label vs custom build — what's the real cost difference over 3 years?

A revenue-share exchange stack at 0.4%/transaction on $500K/month volume costs $2,000/mo ($72,000 over 3 years). A custom dApp at $13K–$25K plus ~$100/mo hosting costs $16,600–$28,600 over 3 years. At $500K/month volume, custom pays back in roughly 18–38 months. At higher volumes, the advantage of custom grows rapidly — revenue share is a permanent tax on your transaction volume that compounds as your business scales.

What does MiCA mean for a white-label blockchain product?

MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) is EU law in force as of 2024–2025, requiring licensing for crypto-asset service providers including exchanges, wallet providers, and certain token issuers. If your branded product facilitates crypto transactions for EU users, you or your white-label provider must operate under a MiCA license. Under a white-label exchange stack, you typically operate under the provider's license — but who bears liability for compliance failures must be stated explicitly in your contract.

Can RapidDev build a custom blockchain dApp front-end or dashboard?

Yes. RapidDev builds branded dApp front-ends, wallet dashboards, portfolio trackers, and on-chain management tools. We integrate existing chains (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, EVM-compatible L2s) via RPC, connect to your chosen custody or wallet providers, and build KYC/AML flows using established providers. We do not build smart contracts, run nodes, or provide regulatory licensing. Timeline is 6–10 weeks, fixed price $13K–$25K, full source code ownership. Book a free scoping call.

What compliance requirements apply to a blockchain product?

It depends entirely on what your product does. A read-only portfolio dashboard with no fiat or token exchange has minimal regulatory exposure. An exchange, swap, or wallet that touches fiat currency or qualifies as a crypto-asset service under MiCA, FinCEN, or BitLicense rules requires licensing or operation under a licensed provider's rails. KYC/AML is mandatory for any product facilitating token transfer or fiat conversion. Securities law may apply if tokens qualify as securities in your jurisdiction. Get legal counsel before launch — not after.

RapidDev

Own your Blockchain Platform, don't rent it

  • Delivered in 6–10 weeks
  • You own 100% of the code
  • No monthly platform fees
Get a free estimate

30-min call. No commitment.

Ready when you are

Fixed price, fixed timeline: $13K–$25K, 6–10 weeks, production-grade code you own. Book a call and get a custom quote at no cost.

Get your custom quote

We put the rapid in RapidDev

Need a dedicated strategic tech and growth partner? Discover what RapidDev can do for your business! Book a call with our team to schedule a free, no-obligation consultation. We'll discuss your project and provide a custom quote at no cost.